Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Deflationism and Semantic Theories of Truth. Pendlebury Press, ISBN 0993594549. Wilfrid Hodges, 2001. Tarski's truth definitions. In the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Richard Kirkham, 1992. Theories of Truth. Bradford Books, ISBN 0-262-61108-2. Saul Kripke, 1975. "Outline of a Theory of Truth". Journal of Philosophy, 72: 690–716.
This approach to semantics is principally associated with Donald Davidson, and attempts to carry out for the semantics of natural language what Tarski's semantic theory of truth achieves for the semantics of logic. [1] Truth-conditional theories of semantics attempt to define the meaning of a given proposition by explaining when the sentence is ...
Peter Strawson formulated a performative theory of truth in the 1950s. Like Ramsey, Strawson believed that there was no separate problem of truth apart from determining the semantic contents (or facts of the world) which give the words and sentences of language the meanings that they have.
The truth conditions for quantified formulas are given purely in terms of truth with no appeal to domains whatsoever (and hence its name truth-value semantics). Game semantics or game-theoretical semantics made a resurgence mainly due to Jaakko Hintikka for logics of (finite) partially ordered quantification , which were originally investigated ...
About Wikipedia; Contact us; Contribute Help; ... Coherence theory of truth; ... Semantic theory of truth; T.
The semantic theory of truth has as its general case for a given language: 'P' is true if and only if P. where 'P' refers to the sentence (the sentence's name), and P is just the sentence itself. Tarski's theory of truth (named after Alfred Tarski) was developed for formal languages, such as formal logic.
The T-schema ("truth schema", not to be confused with "Convention T") is used to check if an inductive definition of truth is valid, which lies at the heart of any realisation of Alfred Tarski's semantic theory of truth. Some authors refer to it as the "Equivalence Schema", a synonym introduced by Michael Dummett. [1]
Generally speaking, the paradox instantiates the problem of determining the status of ungrounded sentences that are not inconsistent. [5] More in particular, the paradox presents the challenge of expanding one’s favourite theory of truth with further principles which either express the symmetry intuition against possibilities 3. and 4.