Ads
related to: elasticsearch use cases in texas state lawlegal.thomsonreuters.com has been visited by 10K+ users in the past month
courtrec.com has been visited by 100K+ users in the past month
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Elastic NV is an American-Dutch software company that provides self-managed and software as a service (SaaS) offerings for search, logging, security, observability, and analytics use cases. [2] It was founded in 2012 in Amsterdam , the Netherlands, and was previously known as Elasticsearch.
Elasticsearch is a search engine based on Apache Lucene. It provides a distributed, multitenant -capable full-text search engine with an HTTP web interface and schema-free JSON documents. Official clients are available in Java , [ 2 ] .NET [ 3 ] ( C# ), PHP , [ 4 ] Python , [ 5 ] Ruby [ 6 ] and many other languages. [ 7 ]
(The Center Square) – The state of Texas has two more wins in court, in a sweeping small business federal regulatory action that a federal judge ruled is unconstitutional and a federal agency ...
This category contains articles regarding case law decided by the courts of Texas. Pages in category "Texas state case law" The following 6 pages are in this category, out of 6 total.
The law applies to "social media platforms" that serve users in the state of Texas, and have more than 50 million monthly active users in the United States.They are defined as any public internet website or application that allows users to "communicate with other users for the primary purpose of posting information, comments, messages, or images", excluding internet service providers ...
A state ban on programs and policies "designed or implemented in reference to race, color, or ethnicity" at Texas public universities and colleges will begin Jan. 1, with institutions of higher ...
Most states use a single official code divided into numbered titles. Pennsylvania's official codification is still in progress. California, New York, and Texas use separate subject-specific codes (or in New York's case, "Consolidated Laws") which must be separately cited by name.
2. Whether the laws’ individualized-explanation requirements comply with the First Amendment: Holding; The judgments are vacated, and the cases are remanded, because neither the Eleventh Circuit nor the Fifth Circuit conducted a proper analysis of the facial First Amendment challenges to Florida and Texas laws regulating large internet platforms.