Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us
A low code-rate close to zero implies a strong code that uses many redundant bits to achieve a good performance, while a large code-rate close to 1 implies a weak code. The redundant bits that protect the information have to be transferred using the same communication resources that they are trying to protect.
Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us; Pages for logged out editors learn more
The distance d was usually understood to limit the error-correction capability to ⌊(d−1) / 2⌋. The Reed–Solomon code achieves this bound with equality, and can thus correct up to ⌊(n−k) / 2⌋ errors. However, this error-correction bound is not exact.
Codes with minimum Hamming distance d = 2 are degenerate cases of error-correcting codes and can be used to detect single errors. The parity bit is an example of a single-error-detecting code. The parity bit is an example of a single-error-detecting code.
There are several known constructions of rank codes, which are maximum rank distance (or MRD) codes with d = n − k + 1.The easiest one to construct is known as the (generalized) Gabidulin code, it was discovered first by Delsarte (who called it a Singleton system) and later by Gabidulin [2] (and Kshevetskiy [3]).
Proof. We need to prove that if you add a burst of length to a codeword (i.e. to a polynomial that is divisible by ()), then the result is not going to be a codeword (i.e. the corresponding polynomial is not divisible by ()).
Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us