Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
When X n converges almost completely towards X then it also converges almost surely to X. In other words, if X n converges in probability to X sufficiently quickly (i.e. the above sequence of tail probabilities is summable for all ε > 0), then X n also converges almost surely to X. This is a direct implication from the Borel–Cantelli lemma.
Each of the probabilities on the right-hand side converge to zero as n → ∞ by definition of the convergence of {X n} and {Y n} in probability to X and Y respectively. Taking the limit we conclude that the left-hand side also converges to zero, and therefore the sequence {(X n, Y n)} converges in probability to {(X, Y)}.
Convergence of random variables, for "almost sure convergence" With high probability; Cromwell's rule, which says that probabilities should almost never be set as zero or one; Degenerate distribution, for "almost surely constant" Infinite monkey theorem, a theorem using the aforementioned terms; List of mathematical jargon
It is equivalent to check condition (iii) for the series = = = (′) where for each , and ′ are IID—that is, to employ the assumption that [] =, since is a sequence of random variables bounded by 2, converging almost surely, and with () = ().
The continuous mapping theorem states that this will also be true if we replace the deterministic sequence {x n} with a sequence of random variables {X n}, and replace the standard notion of convergence of real numbers “→” with one of the types of convergence of random variables.
Then the sequence converges almost surely to a random variable with finite expectation. There is a symmetric statement for submartingales with bounded expectation of the positive part. A supermartingale is a stochastic analogue of a non-increasing sequence, and the condition of the theorem is analogous to the condition in the monotone ...
Using the definition of X, its representation as pointwise limit of the Y k, the monotone convergence theorem for conditional expectations, the last inequality, and the definition of the limit inferior, it follows that almost surely
A sequence of functions () converges uniformly to when for arbitrary small there is an index such that the graph of is in the -tube around f whenever . The limit of a sequence of continuous functions does not have to be continuous: the sequence of functions () = (marked in green and blue) converges pointwise over the entire domain, but the limit function is discontinuous (marked in red).