Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Other reliable sources include university textbooks, books published by respected publishing houses, magazines, journals, and news coverage (not opinions) from mainstream newspapers. Self-published media , where the author and publisher are the same, are usually not acceptable as sources.
Exceptions exist. For example, books on relativity in physics for high school students may be questionable but the one written in the 1950s by Albert Einstein [3] was reliable in its time [4] because the author, as a leading scholar in the field, was qualified to ensure its accuracy. What Wikipedia's reliability guideline requires is that, when ...
Is the author, or this work, cited in other reliable sources? In academic works? This is a rough indicator of post-publication peer review and acceptance. (Pro tips: if there is a DOI link, this will often show "where cited" for scientific publications. If it's a book, searching at Google Books (enclose the book title in quotes) can bring up ...
Wikipedia should be considered to be like a library rather than a single source. Just because a book is in the library does not mean the book is a reliable source, and conversely, just because a book in the library is unreliable does not mean the entire library is unreliable [11]. Thus, a poor article from Wikipedia should not prompt academics ...
There is consensus that AI-generated articles are generally unreliable; The A.V. Club 's parent company, G/O Media, began releasing such pieces in July 2023, usually under the byline "The A.V. Club Bot". [2] 1 AVN (Adult Video News, AVN Magazine) 2021: 2021 AVN is considered generally reliable for the adult industry. Editors should take care to ...
a book written 150 years later that analyzes the proclamation, an academic journal article written two years ago that examines the diary, and; an encyclopedia entry written last year, based on both the book and the journal. Both the proclamation and the diary are primary sources. These primary sources have advantages: they were written at the ...
Fairly reliable Doubts. Provided valid information in the past. D: Not usually reliable Significant doubts. Provided valid information in the past. E: Unreliable Lacks authenticity, trustworthiness, and competency. History of invalid information. F: Reliability unknown Insufficient information to evaluate reliability. May or may not be reliable.
Potentially unreliable sources ; Reliable source examples ; Topic-specific essays. Identifying reliable sources (history) Identifying reliable sources (law) Identifying reliable sources (science) Identifying reliable sources (medicine) Identifying and using style guides (WP:STYLEGUIDES)