Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
[1] Or, in other words, to solve what one desires to solve, one may have to solve more than that in order to get a properly working flow of information. [2] When solving a problem, the natural inclination typically is to remove as much excessive variability and produce limitations on the subject at hand as possible.
For example, the equation x + y = 2x – 1 is solved for the unknown x by the expression x = y + 1, because substituting y + 1 for x in the equation results in (y + 1) + y = 2(y + 1) – 1, a true statement. It is also possible to take the variable y to be the unknown, and then the equation is solved by y = x – 1.
Perfect play for a game is known when the game is solved. [1] Based on the rules of a game, every possible final position can be evaluated (as a win, loss or draw). By backward reasoning, one can recursively evaluate a non-final position as identical to the position that is one move away and best valued for the player whose move it is. Thus a ...
Methods based on Richardson extrapolation, [14] such as the Bulirsch–Stoer algorithm, [15] [16] are often used to construct various methods of different orders. Other desirable features include: dense output: cheap numerical approximations for the whole integration interval, and not only at the points t 0, t 1, t 2, ...
The tangent lines of x 3 − 2x + 2 at 0 and 1 intersect the x-axis at 1 and 0 respectively, illustrating why Newton's method oscillates between these values for some starting points. It is easy to find situations for which Newton's method oscillates endlessly between two distinct values.
As an illustration of this, the parity cycle (1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0) and its sub-cycle (1 1 0 0) are associated to the same fraction 5 / 7 when reduced to lowest terms. In this context, assuming the validity of the Collatz conjecture implies that (1 0) and (0 1) are the only parity cycles generated by positive whole numbers (1 and 2 ...
Most but not all overdetermined systems, when constructed with random coefficients, are inconsistent. For example, the system x 3 – 1 = 0, x 2 – 1 = 0 is overdetermined (having two equations but only one unknown), but it is not inconsistent since it has the solution x = 1.
For example, given a = f(x) = a 0 x 0 + a 1 x 1 + ··· and b = g(x) = b 0 x 0 + b 1 x 1 + ···, the product ab is a specific value of W(x) = f(x)g(x). One may easily find points along W(x) at small values of x, and interpolation based on those points will yield the terms of W(x) and the specific product ab. As fomulated in Karatsuba ...