Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Similarly, a function g defined on domain D and having the same codomain (K, ≤) is an upper bound of f, if g(x) ≥ f (x) for each x in D. The function g is further said to be an upper bound of a set of functions, if it is an upper bound of each function in that set.
In graph theory, a bound graph expresses which pairs of elements of some partially ordered set have an upper bound.Rigorously, any graph G is a bound graph if there exists a partial order ≤ on the vertices of G with the property that for any vertices u and v of G, uv is an edge of G if and only if u ≠ v and there is a vertex w such that u ≤ w and v ≤ w.
Intuitively, the graph of a bounded function stays within a horizontal band, while the graph of an unbounded function does not. In mathematics , a function f {\displaystyle f} defined on some set X {\displaystyle X} with real or complex values is called bounded if the set of its values is bounded .
In graph theory, the Lovász number of a graph is a real number that is an upper bound on the Shannon capacity of the graph. It is also known as Lovász theta function and is commonly denoted by ϑ ( G ) {\displaystyle \vartheta (G)} , using a script form of the Greek letter theta to contrast with the upright theta used for Shannon capacity.
In the graph at right the top line y = n − 1 is an upper bound valid for all n other than one, and attained if and only if n is a prime number. A simple lower bound is φ ( n ) ≥ n / 2 {\displaystyle \varphi (n)\geq {\sqrt {n/2}}} , which is rather loose: in fact, the lower limit of the graph is proportional to n / log log n .
By the boundedness theorem, f is bounded from above, hence, by the Dedekind-completeness of the real numbers, the least upper bound (supremum) M of f exists. It is necessary to find a point d in [a, b] such that M = f(d). Let n be a natural number. As M is the least upper bound, M – 1/n is not an upper bound for f.
An upper bound for R(r, s) can be extracted from the proof of the theorem, and other arguments give lower bounds. (The first exponential lower bound was obtained by Paul Erdős using the probabilistic method.) However, there is a vast gap between the tightest lower bounds and the tightest upper bounds.
In this poset, 60 is an upper bound (though not a least upper bound) of the subset {,,,}, which does not have any lower bound (since 1 is not in the poset); on the other hand 2 is a lower bound of the subset of powers of 2, which does not have any upper bound. If the number 0 is included, this will be the greatest element, since this is a ...