Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The data set [90, 100, 110] has more variability. Its standard deviation is 10 and its average is 100, giving the coefficient of variation as 10 / 100 = 0.1; The data set [1, 5, 6, 8, 10, 40, 65, 88] has still more variability. Its standard deviation is 32.9 and its average is 27.9, giving a coefficient of variation of 32.9 / 27.9 = 1.18
In statistics, McKay's approximation of the coefficient of variation is a statistic based on a sample from a normally distributed population. It was introduced in 1932 by A. T. McKay. [1] Statistical methods for the coefficient of variation often utilizes McKay's approximation. [2] [3] [4] [5]
The formula for the variation around the mode (ModVR) is derived as follows: = = where f m is the modal frequency, K is the number of categories and f i is the frequency of the i th group. This can be simplified to = where N is the total size of the sample.
If the set is a sample from the whole population, then the unbiased sample variance can be calculated as 1017.538 that is the sum of the squared deviations about the mean of the sample, divided by 11 instead of 12. A function VAR.S in Microsoft Excel gives the unbiased sample variance while VAR.P is for population variance.
This is also called Coefficient of Variation or Percent RMS. In many cases, especially for smaller samples, the sample range is likely to be affected by the size of sample which would hamper comparisons. Another possible method to make the RMSD a more useful comparison measure is to divide the RMSD by the interquartile range (IQR). When ...
An upper bound on the relative bias of the estimate is provided by the coefficient of variation (the ratio of the standard deviation to the mean). [2] Under simple random sampling the relative bias is O ( n −1/2 ).
This term was intended to be analogous to the coefficient of variation, for describing multiplicative variation in log-normal data, but this definition of GCV has no theoretical basis as an estimate of itself (see also Coefficient of variation). Note that the geometric mean is smaller than the arithmetic mean.
Notice that Kish's definition of the design effect is closely tied to the coefficient of variation (Kish also calls it relvariance or relvar for short [h]) of the weights (when using the uncorrected (population level) sample standard deviation for estimation). This has several notations in the literature: [9]: 191 [13]: 396