Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Factual relativism (also called epistemic relativism, epistemological relativism, alethic relativism, and cognitive relativism) argues that truth is relative. According to factual relativism, facts used to justify claims are understood to be relative and subjective to the perspective of those proving or falsifying the proposition.
This barrier between fact and value, as construed in epistemology, implies it is impossible to derive ethical claims from factual arguments, or to defend the former using the latter. [ 2 ] The fact–value distinction is closely related to, and derived from, the is–ought problem in moral philosophy, characterized by David Hume . [ 3 ]
The root of the words subjectivity and objectivity are subject and object, philosophical terms that mean, respectively, an observer and a thing being observed.The word subjectivity comes from subject in a philosophical sense, meaning an individual who possesses unique conscious experiences, such as perspectives, feelings, beliefs, and desires, [1] [3] or who (consciously) acts upon or wields ...
Hard science and soft science are colloquial terms used to compare scientific fields on the basis of perceived methodological rigor, exactitude, and objectivity. [1] [2] [3] In general, the formal sciences and natural sciences are considered hard science, whereas the social sciences and other sciences are described as soft science.
The conclusion made by the researchers was that repeating a statement makes it more likely to appear factual. [1] [2] In 1989, Hal R. Arkes, Catherine Hackett, and Larry Boehm replicated the original study, with similar results showing that exposure to false information changes the perceived truthfulness and plausibility of that information. [6]
based on the notion of information content. The information content of a concept (term or word) is the logarithm of the probability of finding the concept in a given corpus. only considers the information content of lowest common subsumer (lcs). A lowest common subsumer is a concept in a lexical taxonomy ( e.g. WordNet), which has the shortest ...
(Analogously, one might hold that it is a fact that it is winter in the Northern Hemisphere, even though this is not always the case, implying that some facts are temporary.) Giovanni Merlo has developed a specific version of metaphysical subjectivism, under which subjective facts always concern mental properties. [7]
Only a few research studies looked for the crucial assumptions of the Inference Based Approach, [11] other aspects of inferential confusion such as irrelevant associations, category errors, facts taken out of context, and individual differences in the level of absorption have not yet been integrated in research. [8]