Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
1942: The company was renamed to Takachiho Optical Co., Ltd., when optical products became the mainstay of the company. [36] 1949: The name changed to Olympus Optical Co., Ltd. It was named after Mount Olympus, which like Mt. Takachiho is the home of gods, this time of Greek mythology. In the words of the company, they chose the name to ...
The Tough TG-4 is a significant upgrade over its predecessor with the addition of Raw support. Olympus' cool 'Live Composite mode', a pair of custom setting spots on the mode dial, and additional underwater modes are also new features. [8] Olympus Tough TG-5: 12.0 2017 Olympus Tough TG-5 is the upgrade from TG-4 but with less megapixels. [9]
At All Star Grand Queendom on April 23, Shirakawa won the Wonder of Stardom Championship by defeating Saya Kamitani, ending the latter's 480-day reign which was the second longest ever at date. [11] Shirakawa lost the title to Tam Nakano 34 days later in a Winner Takes All match where Nakano's World of Stardom Championship was also on the line ...
For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us
Building at Olympus head office in Tokyo. Olympus Corporation, a major Japanese manufacturer of optical imaging laboratory and medical equipment listed on the Tokyo Stock Exchange had, according to its accounts for the year ended 31 March 2011, consolidated net sales of ¥847.1 billion (US$10.6 billion) in the year, and total shareholders' equity of ¥262.5 billion (US$3.3 billion).
The Olympus XA was a series of 35 mm cameras manufactured and marketed by Olympus of Japan from 1979 to 1985. The original XA was a rangefinder camera with a fast 35 mm f/2.8 lens, and aperture priority metering.
The Olympus OM-4 is an interchangeable-lens, 35 mm film, single lens reflex (SLR) camera; manufactured by Olympus Optical Co., Ltd. (today Olympus Corporation) in Japan, and sold as OM-4 from 1983 to 1987 and as OM-4Ti from 1986 to 2002.
NEW DELHI (Reuters) -OpenAI faces an uphill climb as it argues that Indian courts cannot hear lawsuits about its U.S.-based business in the country, where Telegram has failed with similar defences ...