Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The 2006 Ontario terrorism case is the plotting of a series of attacks against targets in Southern Ontario, Canada, and the June 2, 2006 counter-terrorism raids in and around the Greater Toronto Area that resulted in the arrest of 14 adults and 4 youths (the "Toronto 18"). [1]
[3] [4] [5] This was the first time in Canada that someone was charged with terrorism because of a misogynist ideology. [13] On September 14, 2022, the perpetrator entered a guilty plea to murder and attempted murder. [7] [8] [9] The attack was ruled a terrorist attack during sentencing proceedings. [14]
Four of the men tried to cross the Rainbow Bridge into the United States in October 1991. Customs officials searched their Buick and Chevrolet Suburban and found "detailed plans to bomb a York Region Hindu temple and an Indian theater in Toronto", including aerial photographs and blueprints of the Vishnu Mandir Temple and India Centre cinema, [4] as well as references to a "hit team," a "guard ...
The ministers were briefed on the attack shortly after it occurred and the day after the attack, the meeting's agenda included discussion on "soft targets", terrorism and social media, and online youth radicalization. [50] The incident was included in the 2018 Public Report on the Terrorism Threat to Canada. [51]
Canadian police denied claims on Wednesday by Islamic State that it was responsible for a weekend shooting in Toronto that killed two people and wounded 13.
Ontario premier Doug Ford described the attack as "the most brazen shooting" of a year full of gun violence. [40] Toronto Mayor John Tory called the shooting an "unspeakable act" and an attack on a city with a gun problem, and called on the federal government for a ban on handguns. [41]
Toronto police are searching for a motorcycle rider wanted in connection with two suspected hate-motivated mischief offenses at synagogues overnight Sunday, according to a news release.. The two ...
Lumpers define terrorism broadly, brooking no distinction between this tactic and guerrilla warfare or civil war. Terrorist splitters, by contrast, define terrorism narrowly, as the select use of violence against civilians for putative political gain. As Abrahms notes, these two definitions yield different policy implications: