Ad
related to: civil injunction against harassment
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
A Civil Harassment Restraining Order (CHO) is a form of restraining order or order of protection used in the state of California.It is a legal intervention in which a person who is deemed to be harassing, threatening or stalking another person is ordered to stop, with the goal of reducing risk of further threat or harm to the person being harassed.
Non-molestation orders are a type of injunction used to protect an individual from intimidation or harassment. Breaching a non-molestation order is a criminal offence. [19] Under the Domestic Violence Crime and Victims Act 2004, cohabiting same-sex couples are able to seek a non-molestation order. [20]
An injunction can require someone to do something, like clean up an oil spill or remove a spite fence. Or it can prohibit someone from doing something, like using an illegally obtained trade secret. An injunction that requires conduct is called a "mandatory injunction." An injunction that prohibits conduct is called a "prohibitory injunction."
It also throws out the injunction against Wallace’s “followers” — who were never identified in court or notified of the proceedings — because it would violate their rights if enforced.
Part 1 of the Act empowers specified organisations to apply to the courts for a civil injunction against anyone aged 10 or over for actual or threatened anti-social behaviour. [12] Suggested by the government is that civil injunctions might be used for aggressive begging, bullying , gangs , irresponsible dog ownership, noisy or abusive ...
Jay Peters filed the lawsuit in the 13th Judicial District Court in February asking for damages for defamation and harassment as well as an injunction to stop Cordova from ...
Leah Remini's 2024 centers on her bombshell defamation and harassment lawsuit against the Church of Scientology.. Back-to-back hearings in the civil case. On Jan. 16, there was a three-hour ...
A power of committal to prison was available for breach of a civil injunction, but a court was unlikely to exercise that power. A person subject to an anti-social behaviour order where it did not follow a criminal conviction had an automatic right of appeal against both the making of the order and its terms to a higher court.