Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Friedman introduced the theory in a 1970 essay for The New York Times titled "A Friedman Doctrine: The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase Its Profits". [2] In it, he argued that a company has no social responsibility to the public or society; its only responsibility is to its shareholders. [2]
This modification, however, had a significant effect on Friedman's own approach, so, as a result, the theory of the Friedmanian Phillips curve also changed. [113] Moreover, new classical adherent Neil Wallace , who was a graduate student at the University of Chicago between 1960 and 1963, regarded Friedman's theoretical courses as a mess ...
Friedman's argument, which challenged the use of fiscal policy in smoothing out business cycles, [17] was challenged by stressing the relation between consumption and disposable income still follows (more or less) the mechanism supposed by Keynes. [2] [18] Friedman starts elaborating his theory under the assumption of complete certainty.
The slogan that "money matters" has come to be associated with Friedman, but Friedman had also leveled harsh criticism of his ideological opponents. Referring to Thorstein Veblen 's assertion that economics unrealistically models people as "lightning calculator[s] of pleasure and pain", Friedman wrote: [ 41 ]
The Lexus and the Olive Tree: Understanding Globalization is a 1999 book by Thomas L. Friedman that posits that the world is currently undergoing two struggles: the drive for prosperity and development, symbolized by the Lexus LS, and the desire to retain identity and traditions, symbolized by the olive tree.
Friedman developed his own quantity theory of money that referred to Irving Fisher's but inherited much from Keynes. [89] Friedman's 1956 "The Quantity Theory of Money: A Restatement" [k] incorporated Keynes's demand for money and liquidity preference into an equation similar to the classical equation of exchange. [90]
From such Friedman rejects testing a theory by the realism of its assumptions. Rather simplicity and fruitfulness incline toward such assumptions and postulates as utility maximization , profit maximization , and ideal types —not merely to describe (which may be beside the point) but to predict economic behavior and to provide an engine of ...
While Friedman often mentioned Hayek as an important influence, Hayek rarely mentioned Friedman. [250] He deeply disagreed with Chicago School methodology, quantitative and macroeconomic focus, and claimed that Friedman's Essays in Positive Economics was as dangerous a book as Keynes' General Theory. [251]