When.com Web Search

  1. Ad

    related to: uspto reexamination vs inter parte 1 california form

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Inter partes review - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inter_partes_review

    An inter partes review is used to challenge the patentability of one or more claims in a U.S. patent only on a ground that could be raised under 35 U.S.C. §§ 102 or 103 (non-obviousness), and only on the basis of prior art consisting of patents or printed publications. [3]

  3. Reexamination - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reexamination

    A request for a reexamination can be filed by anyone at any time during the period of enforceability of a patent. To request a reexamination, one must submit a "request for reexamination" which includes (1) a statement pointing out each "substantial new question of patentability based on prior patents and printed publications; (2) an identification and explanation for every claim for which ...

  4. Leahy–Smith America Invents Act - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leahy–Smith_America...

    The USPTO is given authority to adjust its fees in a way that "in the aggregate" recover the estimated costs of its activities. [10] Review of inter partes reexamination. Direct appeal to the Federal Circuit is the only option for judicial review in inter partes reexamination cases. [10] Additional USPTO facilities.

  5. Title 35 of the United States Code - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Title_35_of_the_United...

    (c) FORM.—A claim may be written in independent or, if the nature of the case admits, in dependent or multiple dependent form. (d) REFERENCE IN DEPENDENT FORMS.—Subject to subsection (e), a claim in dependent form shall contain a reference to a claim previously set forth and then specify a further limitation of the subject matter claimed.

  6. United States patent law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_patent_law

    US Congress established an inter partes reexamination to allow the USPTO to review validity of issued patents with participation of third party challengers. However, just like the ex parte reexamination introduced earlier, this process failed to gain popularity, in part due to being slow and to barring subsequent civil litigation. 2006. In eBay v.

  7. Term of patent in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Term_of_patent_in_the...

    The original patent term under the 1790 Patent Act was decided individually for each patent, but "not exceeding fourteen years". The 1836 Patent Act (5 Stat. 117, 119, 5) provided (in addition to the fourteen-year term) an extension "for the term of seven years from and after the expiration of the first term" in certain circumstances, when the inventor hasn't got "a reasonable remuneration for ...

  8. List of patent claim types - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_patent_claim_types

    This is a list of special types of claims that may be found in a patent or patent application.For explanations about independent and dependent claims and about the different categories of claims, i.e. product or apparatus claims (claims referring to a physical entity), and process, method or use claims (claims referring to an activity), see Claim (patent), section "Basic types and categories".

  9. Glossary of patent law terms - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glossary_of_patent_law_terms

    The Patent Application Locating and Monitoring System (PALM) is used to support the Reexamination process inside the USPTO. Reexamination is the examination of a granted patent, which can result in the revocation of that patent. The PALM system is used with both Image File Wrappers and paper File Wrappers.