When.com Web Search

Search results

1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network

2. File:Wikipedia Edit-a-Thon checklist.pdf - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Wikipedia_Edit-a-Thon...

   What links here; Upload file; Special pages; Printable version; Page information; Get shortened URL; Download QR code

3. File:How to conduct Wikipedia Editing Training (lesson plan).pdf

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:How_to_conduct...

   There is an accompanying slidedeck called 'Exemplar training ppt' which you should also download. Please message Wikimedia UK (info@wikimedia.org.uk) to let them know you are planning to run a training session as there are signup sheets, feedback forms and Wikimedia swag materials they can provide you with along with guidance about best practice.

4. Wikipedia:Training/Newcomers/Editing basics - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/.../Newcomers/Editing_basics

   Download as PDF; Printable version; In other projects Wikidata item; Appearance. move to sidebar hide ... Now it's time to get started editing!

5. List of proofreader's marks - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_proofreader's_marks

   This article is a list of standard proofreader's marks used to indicate and correct problems in a text. Marks come in two varieties, abbreviations and abstract symbols. These are usually handwritten on the paper containing the

6. Edit-a-thon - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edit-a-thon

   The events typically include basic editing training for new editors and may be combined with a more general social meetup. The word is a portmanteau of "edit" and "marathon". An edit-a-thon can either be "in-person" or online or a blended version of both. If it is not in-person, it is usually called a "virtual edit-a-thon" or "online edit-a-thon".

7. Wikipedia:Good editing practices - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Good_editing...

   When an editor lacks the time or knowledge needed to address a problem properly. When an editor is patrolling for a particular type of problem. When material is sufficiently questionable that readers need to be alerted to the fact. When there is reason to believe an edit to article content might provoke an edit war.