When.com Web Search

  1. Ads

    related to: ri defendant smart search portal oregon state

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Stop and identify statutes - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stop_and_identify_statutes

    The Nevada Supreme Court interpreted "identify" under the state's law to mean merely stating one's name. As of April 2008, 23 other states had similar laws. Additional states (including Arizona, Texas, South Dakota and Oregon) have such laws just for motorists, [6] [7] [8] which penalize the failure to present a driver license during a traffic ...

  3. Courts of Oregon - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Courts_of_Oregon

    State courts of Oregon Courtroom of the Oregon Supreme Court. Oregon Supreme Court [1] Oregon Court of Appeals [2] Oregon Circuit Courts (36 courts, one for each county, administratively divided between 27 judicial districts) [3] Oregon Justice Courts [4] Oregon Municipal Courts [5] Oregon County Courts [4] Oregon Tax Court [6] Federal courts ...

  4. Personal jurisdiction in Internet cases in the United States

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personal_jurisdiction_in...

    Zippo Dot Com, the court considered state and federal trademark infringement and trademark dilution claims. The plaintiff was Zippo Manufacturing, famous for their lighters. The defendant, Zippo Dot Com, operated a web portal and news service out of California. Dot Com offered three levels of service, the upper two of which required ...

  5. 44 Liquormart, Inc. v. Rhode Island - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/44_Liquormart,_Inc._v...

    44 Liquormart, Inc. v. Rhode Island, 517 U.S. 484 (1996), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a complete ban on the advertising of alcohol prices was unconstitutional under the First Amendment, and that the Twenty-first Amendment, empowering the states to regulate alcohol, did not lessen other constitutional restraints of state power.

  6. Rhode Island v. Innis - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhode_Island_v._Innis

    Rhode Island v. Innis, 446 U.S. 291 (1980), is a decision by the United States Supreme Court that clarifies what constitutes "interrogation" for the purposes of Miranda warnings. Under Miranda v. Arizona, police are forbidden from interrogating a suspect once he has asserted his right to counsel under the Sixth Amendment.

  7. Full transparency restored: RI secretary of state opens voter ...

    www.aol.com/full-transparency-restored-ri...

    The secretary of state's predecessor had broken from long-standing policy allowing the public to get databases that included complete birthdates. Full transparency restored: RI secretary of state ...