Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Terms implied "in law" are confined to particular categories of contract, particularly employment contracts or contracts between landlords and tenants, as necessary incidents of the relationship. For instance, in every employment contract , there is an implied term of mutual trust and confidence , supporting the notion that workplace relations ...
In English Law, This principle was established in the case of Spring v NASDS, [16] in the context of a Trade Union membership contract. Clear expression: The term must be capable of clear expression. No specific technical knowledge should be required. Consistency: The implied term may not contradict an express term.
The common law, indeed, does so little to prescribe the relative duties of landlord and tenant, since it leaves the latter at liberty to pursue any course of management he pleases, provided he is not guilty of waste, that it is by no means surprising that the Courts should have been favourably inclined to the introduction of those regulations ...
Liverpool City Council v Irwin [1976] UKHL 1 is a leading English contract law case concerning the basis on which courts may imply terms into contracts; in particular in relation to all types of tenancies (including leases of land), a term may be implied if required for a particular relationship, such as for the landlord to keep the stairwells clear in a tower block.
The Law Commission and the Scottish Law Commission have recommended that the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999 and the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 should be replaced by a more unified and coherent regime. [2] As of 2015, the Law Commission's recommendations were implemented in part by Part 2 of the Consumer Rights Act 2015
Cases on implied terms in English law. This includes cases on remoteness due to the decision in The Achilleas. According many academics should technically include cases on frustration and common mistake.
Implied terms, absurdity, wretchedly conceived clauses Arnold v Britton [2013] EWCA Civ 902 is an English contract law case concerned with implied terms . The case was the subject of an Appeal Court ruling in 2013 and a Supreme Court decision in 2015.
Southern Foundries (1926) Ltd v Shirlaw [1940] AC 701 is an important English contract law and company law case. In the field of contracts it is well known for MacKinnon LJ's decision in the Court of Appeal, where he put forth the "officious bystander" formulation for determining what terms should be implied into agreements by the courts.