Ad
related to: statistical fallacies list and meaning of numbers printable chart
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Persuasive definition – purporting to use the "true" or "commonly accepted" meaning of a term while, in reality, using an uncommon or altered definition. (cf. the if-by-whiskey fallacy) Ecological fallacy – inferring about the nature of an entity based solely upon aggregate statistics collected for the group to which that entity belongs. [27]
Statistics, when used in a misleading fashion, can trick the casual observer into believing something other than what the data shows. That is, a misuse of statistics occurs when a statistical argument asserts a falsehood. In some cases, the misuse may be accidental. In others, it is purposeful and for the gain of the perpetrator.
The four common statistical ecological fallacies are: confusion between ecological correlations and individual correlations, confusion between group average and total average, Simpson's paradox, and confusion between higher average and higher likelihood. From a statistical point of view, these ideas can be unified by specifying proper ...
Printable version; In other projects ... Pages in category "Probability fallacies" The following 7 pages are in this category, out of 7 total. ... Statistics; Cookie ...
Print/export Download as PDF; Printable version; ... Pages in category "Statistical paradoxes" The following 18 pages are in this category, out of 18 total.
In mathematics, certain kinds of mistaken proof are often exhibited, and sometimes collected, as illustrations of a concept called mathematical fallacy.There is a distinction between a simple mistake and a mathematical fallacy in a proof, in that a mistake in a proof leads to an invalid proof while in the best-known examples of mathematical fallacies there is some element of concealment or ...
The law of truly large numbers (a statistical adage), attributed to Persi Diaconis and Frederick Mosteller, states that with a large enough number of independent samples, any highly implausible (i.e. unlikely in any single sample, but with constant probability strictly greater than 0 in any sample) result is likely to be observed. [1]
The usage of percentages as labels on a pie chart can be misleading when the sample size is small. [8] Making a pie chart 3D or adding a slant will make interpretation difficult due to distorted effect of perspective. [9] Bar-charted pie graphs in which the height of the slices is varied may confuse the reader. [9]