Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Let S be a statement of the form P implies Q (P → Q). Then the converse of S is the statement Q implies P (Q → P). In general, the truth of S says nothing about the truth of its converse, [2] unless the antecedent P and the consequent Q are logically equivalent. For example, consider the true statement "If I am a human, then I am mortal."
" In this case, unlike the last example, the inverse of the statement is true. The converse is "If a polygon has four sides, then it is a quadrilateral." Again, in this case, unlike the last example, the converse of the statement is true. The negation is "There is at least one quadrilateral that does not have four sides.
Obversion changes the quality (that is the affirmativity or negativity) of the statement and the predicate term. [10] For example, by obversion, a universal affirmative statement become a universal negative statement with the predicate term that is the class complement of the predicate term of the original universal affirmative statement.
Propositional logic deals with statements, which are defined as declarative sentences having truth value. [29] [1] Examples of statements might include: Wikipedia is a free online encyclopedia that anyone can edit. London is the capital of England. All Wikipedia editors speak at least three languages.
This statement expresses the idea "' if and only if '". In particular, the truth value of p ↔ q {\displaystyle p\leftrightarrow q} can change from one model to another. On the other hand, the claim that two formulas are logically equivalent is a statement in metalanguage , which expresses a relationship between two statements p {\displaystyle ...
In propositional logic, affirming the consequent (also known as converse error, fallacy of the converse, or confusion of necessity and sufficiency) is a formal fallacy (or an invalid form of argument) that is committed when, in the context of an indicative conditional statement, it is stated that because the consequent is true, therefore the ...
Over the past year, a number of high-profile companies have done about-faces on diversity, including Meta (), Walmart (), McDonald's (), Lowe’s (), Ford (), Tractor Supply (), and John Deere ...
The converse relation does satisfy the (weaker) axioms of a semigroup with involution: () = and () =. [12] Since one may generally consider relations between different sets (which form a category rather than a monoid, namely the category of relations Rel ), in this context the converse relation conforms to the axioms of a dagger category (aka ...