When.com Web Search

  1. Ad

    related to: highly cited papers that are badly written

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Highly Cited Researchers - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Highly_Cited_Researchers

    There are 21 specific fields, and one for interdisciplinary science—Clarivate creates a list of papers that are in the top 1% most highly cited in their field, [a] and admission to the HCR list is based on an author's number of papers in the top 1%. [13] The resulting list of highly cited researchers can be manipulated by citation cartels.

  3. Citation impact - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citation_impact

    The most-cited paper in history is a paper by Oliver Lowry describing an assay to measure the concentration of proteins. [13] By 2014 it had accumulated more than 305,000 citations. The 10 most cited papers all had more than 40,000 citations. [14] To reach the top-100 papers required 12,119 citations by 2014. [14]

  4. Coercive citation - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coercive_citation

    Coercive citation, on the other hand, is a specific unethical business practice in which the editor asks the author to add citations to papers published in the very same journal (self-citation) and in particular to cite papers that the author regards as duplicate or irrelevant. [5] Specifically, the term refers to requests which: [2]

  5. Retraction in academic publishing - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Retraction_in_academic...

    Wansink had written a blog post about asking a graduate student to "salvage" conclusions. Cornell University launched an investigation, which determined in 2018 that Wansink had committed academic misconduct. Wansink resigned. [25] [26] [27] Wansink has since had 18 of his research papers retracted as similar issues were found in other ...

  6. Grievance studies affair - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grievance_studies_affair

    (1) journals with higher impact factors were more likely to reject papers submitted as part of the project; (2) the chances were better, if the manuscript was allegedly based on empirical data; (3) peer reviews can be an important asset in the process of revising a manuscript; and (4) when the project authors, with academic education from ...

  7. Wikipedia:Wikipedia as a Citable Source - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_as_a...

    Research papers, particularly the one research paper students write in their eleventh grade, have always been an integral part of high school education [4].They stress the need to verify information and teach students how to evaluate sources critically, and as a result, teachers have developed various criteria to help students identify credible sources, an especially important skill in the ...

  8. Wikipedia:Notability (academics) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability...

    The most typical way of satisfying Criterion 1 is to show that the academic has been an author of highly cited academic work – either several extremely highly cited scholarly publications or a substantial number of scholarly publications with significant citation rates. Reviews of the person's work, published in selective academic ...

  9. Journal ranking - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Journal_ranking

    Top quartile citation count (TQCC) – reflecting the number of citations accrued by the paper that resides at the top quartile (the 75th percentile) of a journal's articles when sorted by citation counts; for example, when a journal published 100 papers, the 25th most-cited paper's citation count is the TQCC. [5]