Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Robot ethics, sometimes known as "roboethics", concerns ethical problems that occur with robots, such as whether robots pose a threat to humans in the long or short run, whether some uses of robots are problematic (such as in healthcare or as 'killer robots' in war), and how robots should be designed such that they act 'ethically' (this last concern is also called machine ethics).
And, as Carme Torras, research professor at the Institut de Robòtica i Informàtica Industrial (Institute of robotics and industrial computing) at the Technical University of Catalonia notes, [185] in higher education, science fiction is also increasingly used for teaching technology-related ethical issues in technological degrees.
Close attention to ethical decision making during the research and development of robot products. Particular focal points include a commitment to sustainable development and production, recognition of the need for diverse viewpoints as the technology is developed, and careful attention that any potential ethical issues are resolved before ...
James H. Moor, one of the pioneering theoreticians in the field of computer ethics, defines four kinds of ethical robots.As an extensive researcher on the studies of philosophy of artificial intelligence, philosophy of mind, philosophy of science, and logic, Moor defines machines as ethical impact agents, implicit ethical agents, explicit ethical agents, or full ethical agents.
AI safety is an interdisciplinary field focused on preventing accidents, misuse, or other harmful consequences arising from artificial intelligence (AI) systems. It encompasses machine ethics and AI alignment, which aim to ensure AI systems are moral and beneficial, as well as monitoring AI systems for risks and enhancing their reliability.
We believe robots have the potential to provide immense positive impact to society. We want to encourage responsible robot research. Bad practice hurts us all. Addressing obvious public concerns will help us all make progress. It is important to demonstrate that we, as roboticists, are committed to the best possible standards of practice.
From 2006 to 2009, with Noel Sharkey, Owen Holland and Frank Burnet, [33] Winfield led public engagement project Walking with Robots. [34] The project was designed to encourage children into science and technology careers, and to involve the public in discussions about robotics research issues. [35]
AI developers may have to continuously refine their ethical frameworks to ensure that their systems align with evolving human values. [33] In essence, AI alignment may not be a static destination but rather an open, flexible process. Alignment solutions that continually adapt to ethical considerations may offer the most robust approach. [33]