Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) v Morgan [1975] UKHL 3 was a decision of the House of Lords which decided that an honest belief by a man that a woman with whom he was engaged with sexual intercourse was consenting was a defence to rape, irrespective of whether that belief was based on reasonable grounds.
In May 1974, the Campaign for Homosexual Equality suggested a basic age of consent of 16, but that could be as low as 12 "in cases where a defendant could prove the existence of meaningful consent". [19] [20] The Sexual Law Reform Society proposed in September of that year lowering the age of consent to 14, with the requirement that below the ...
The victim claimed to be a policeman, which was not true, and could not produce a warrant card when asked. A fight followed, and the victim "sustained injuries to his face, loosened teeth and bleeding gums". At the trial the jury were told that mistake can only be a defence if the mistake was reasonable. The jury returned a verdict of guilty.
Consent. As to consent, see sections 12 to 15 of the Sexual Offences (Scotland) Act 2009. As to whether a sleeping or unconscious person has capacity to consent, see section 14 of that Act. As to whether a mentally disordered person has capacity to consent, see section 17 of that Act. Reasonable belief
Legal education in the United Kingdom is divided between the common law system of England and Wales and Northern Ireland, and that of Scotland, which uses a hybrid of common law and civil law. The Universities of Dundee , Glasgow and Strathclyde , [ 1 ] in Scotland, are the only universities in the UK to offer a dual-qualifying degree.
In law, knowledge is one of the degrees of mens rea that constitute part of a crime.For example, in English law, the offence of knowingly being a passenger in a vehicle taken without consent requires that the prosecution prove not only that the defendant was a passenger in a vehicle and that it was taken by the driver without consent, but also that the defendant knew that it was taken without ...
Grainger plc v Nicholson [2010] IRLR 4 is a UK employment discrimination law case, concerning the protection of religion or belief. Regarding the question of an employee's conviction about climate change, it examines the scope of the legislation's protection.
Reasonable care, Informed consent Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board [2015] UKSC 11 is a Scottish delict , medical negligence and English tort law case on doctors and pharmacists that outlines the rule on the disclosure of risks to satisfy the criteria of an informed consent .