Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
This sequence of numbers of parents is the Fibonacci sequence. The number of ancestors at each level, F n, is the number of female ancestors, which is F n−1, plus the number of male ancestors, which is F n−2. [90] [91] This is under the unrealistic assumption that the ancestors at each level are otherwise unrelated.
The smallest integer m > 1 such that p n # + m is a prime number, where the primorial p n # is the product of the first n prime numbers. A005235 Semiperfect numbers
A repfigit, or Keith number, is an integer such that, when its digits start a Fibonacci sequence with that number of digits, the original number is eventually reached. An example is 47, because the Fibonacci sequence starting with 4 and 7 (4, 7, 11, 18, 29, 47) reaches 47. A repfigit can be a tribonacci sequence if there are 3 digits in the ...
A Fibonacci prime is a Fibonacci number that is prime, a type of integer sequence prime. The first Fibonacci primes are (sequence A005478 in the OEIS ): 2 , 3 , 5 , 13 , 89 , 233 , 1597, 28657, 514229, 433494437, 2971215073, ....
This page was last edited on 14 September 2019, at 05:01 (UTC).; Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License; additional terms may apply.
Plot of the first 10,000 Pisano periods. In number theory, the nth Pisano period, written as π (n), is the period with which the sequence of Fibonacci numbers taken modulo n repeats.
Although the resulting Fibonacci sequence dates back long before Leonardo, [9] its inclusion in his book is why the sequence is named after him today. The fourth section derives approximations, both numerical and geometrical, of irrational numbers such as square roots. [10] The book also includes proofs in Euclidean geometry. [11]
In the Fibonacci sequence, each number is the sum of the previous two numbers. Fibonacci omitted the "0" and first "1" included today and began the sequence with 1, 2, 3, ... . He carried the calculation up to the thirteenth place, the value 233, though another manuscript carries it to the next place, the value 377. [34] [35] Fibonacci did not ...