Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Permissive licenses generally originate in academic institutions like the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.. Permissive licenses, also known as academic licenses, [49] allow recipients to use, modify, and distribute software with no obligation to provide source code.
More than 90 percent of companies use open-source software as a component of their proprietary software. [70] The decision to use open-source software, or even engage with open-source projects to improve existing open-source software, is typically a pragmatic business decision.
These examples of modern PD software (after the Berne Convention Implementation Act of 1988) are either under proper public domain (e.g. created by a US governmental organization), under a proper public domain like license (for instance CC0), or accompanied by a clear waiver statement from the author.
BSD licenses are a family of permissive free software licenses, imposing minimal restrictions on the use and distribution of covered software.This is in contrast to copyleft licenses, which have share-alike requirements.
In 2000, the "Do What the Fuck You Want To Public License" was released as a public-domain-equivalent license for software. [2]It is distinguished among software licenses by its informal style and lack of a warranty disclaimer.
Node-locked licensing, also known as a single use license, [1] device license, [2] named host license, or machine-based license, is a software licensing approach in which a license for a software application is assigned to one or more hardware devices (specific nodes, such as a computer, mobile devices, or IoT device).
The GNU General Public Licenses (GNU GPL, or simply GPL) are a series of widely used free software licenses, or copyleft licenses, that guarantee end users the freedoms to run, study, share, or modify the software. [7]
The GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL) is a free-software license published by the Free Software Foundation (FSF). The license allows developers and companies to use and integrate a software component released under the LGPL into their own (even proprietary) software without being required by the terms of a strong copyleft license to release the source code of their own components.