Ad
related to: are citations in abstracts bad words examples- Free Essay Checker
Proofread your essay with ease.
Writing that makes the grade.
- Free Grammar Checker
Check your grammar in seconds.
Feel confident in your writing.
- Do Your Best Work
A writing assistant built for work.
Make excellent writing effortless.
- Multiple Plans Available
Free and paid plans available.
Find the right plan for your needs.
- Free Essay Checker
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
An article with just four or five really good sources is considered better referenced than an article that cites 500 bad ones. Overloading an article with bad citations can backfire if the article is nominated for deletion. Participators may not want to look at all one hundred citations, and they may instead choose to look at just a smaller sample.
The informative abstract, also known as the complete abstract, is a compendious summary of a paper's substance and its background, purpose, methodology, results, and conclusion. [ 23 ] [ 24 ] Usually between 100 and 200 words, the informative abstract summarizes the paper's structure, its major topics and key points. [ 23 ]
xkcd webcomic titled "Wikipedian Protester". The sign says: "[CITATION NEEDED]".[1]A citation is a reference to a source. More precisely, a citation is an abbreviated alphanumeric expression embedded in the body of an intellectual work that denotes an entry in the bibliographic references section of the work for the purpose of acknowledging the relevance of the works of others to the topic of ...
In cases where citations are lacking, the template {} can be added after the statement in question. The following table shows examples of these ways of citing sources, categorized as "the good, the bad and the ugly".
If a word or phrase is particularly contentious, an inline citation may be added next to that word or phrase within the sentence, but it is usually sufficient to add the citation to the end of the clause, sentence, or paragraph, so long as it's clear which source supports which part of the text.
This sort of "reference spamming" disrupts the flow of reading an article. Citation overkill states "If there is a good reason to keep multiple citations, for example, to avoid perennial edit warring or because the sources offer a range of beneficial information, clutter may be avoided by merging the citations into a single footnote."
The opening <ref> tag is malformed or has a bad name (see the help page). The <ref> tag has too many names (see the help page). The <ref> tag name cannot be a simple integer (see the help page). A <ref> tag is missing the closing </ref> (see the help page). The named reference $1 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
Wikipedia:Citation overkill This discusses why numerous citations after a single sentences are too much, not why one would not want to cite every sentence; Wikipedia:Bombardment A similar argument to the one above; Wikipedia:You don't need to cite that the sky is blue A classic argument on that not everything needs to be cited