Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The Supreme Court of the United States upheld the act in Stafford v. Wallace (1922). [2] Chief Justice William Howard Taft reasoned the act was a valid exercise under the interstate Commerce Clause because it addressed the same problem as the injunction upheld in Swift & Co. v. United States (1905).
In Stafford v. Wallace, the Court articulated a "stream of commerce" test; if a transaction affected commerce in a transition that was local, but supported interstate commerce, then Congress could regulate those transactions under the commerce clause. [31]
Stafford v. Wallace, 258 U.S. 495 (1922), upheld a federal law (the Packers and Stockyards Act) regulating the Chicago meatpacking industry, because the industry was part of the interstate commerce of beef from ranchers to dinner
For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us
Federal Trade Commission v. Winsted Hosiery Company: 483 (1922) Brandeis none none 2d Cir. reversed Stafford v. Wallace: 495 (1922) Taft none none N.D. Ill. affirmed Shwab v. Doyle: 529 (1922) McKenna none none 6th Cir. reversed Union Trust Company v. Wardell, Collector of Internal Revenue: 537 (1922) McKenna none none N.D. Cal. reversed Levy v.
Matthew Stafford's 16th NFL season came to an end in the Los Angeles Rams' 28-22 divisional playoff loss against the Philadelphia Eagles.. Immediately, the soon-to-be 37-year-old was asked what ...
2025 Oscar predictions Best Picture. WINNER PREDICTION: Anora The Brutalist A Complete Unknown Conclave Dune: Part Two Emilia Pérez I'm Still Here Nickel Boys
United States v. Moreland: 258 U.S. 433 (1922) Fifth Amendment, hard labor in prison Child Labor Tax Case: 259 U.S. 20 (1922) docket title Bailey v. Drexel Furniture Co., found the Child Labor Tax Law of 1919 was not a valid use of Congress' power under the Taxing and Spending Clause: Hill v. Wallace: 259 U.S. 44 (1922)