Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Vindicius was said to have discovered papers that exposed Tarquin's plot to regain power after the overthrow of the Roman monarchy.Tarquin had been attempting to have his possessions legally restored to him, and the papers indicated that he was doing so in order to be allowed into Rome again with the intention of killing Rome's first consuls, Collatinus and Brutus, and reinstalling himself as ...
The ultio exercised by emperors was to be balanced with the virtue of clementia, tolerance or mercy. [2] Augustus honored Mars Ultor and Ultio in his role as the avenger of the murder of Julius Caesar , whose adopted heir he was, but he founded the cult and temple only 40 years later, to mark the return of the Roman military standards captured ...
Vindicta is a 2023 American slasher film from the screenplay of Ian Neligh directed by Sean McNamara.It stars Elena Kampouris, Jeremy Piven and Sean Astin.The film centers on a rookie paramedic whose first days in a city plagued by riots becomes all the more terrifying when a sadistic serial killer begins targeting a select group of people, leading her to learn of a dark secret with ...
United Brands v Commission (1976) Case 27/76 is an EU competition legal case concerning abuse of a dominant position in a relevant product market.The case involved the infamous "green banana clause".
Da Costa v Jones (1778) 2 Cowp 729; HIH Casualty and General Insurance Ltd v Chase Manhattan Bank Rix LJ stated, "I am conscious that in Carter v. Boehm itself Lord Mansfield does seem to have considered that there was a difference between the concealment which the duty of good faith prohibited and mere silence (‘Aliud est celare; aliud ...
c. 12) to distribute compensation paid by the Egyptian government to the UK government with respect to British properties it had nationalised. Anisminic claimed that they were eligible for compensation under the Orders, and the claim was determined by a tribunal (the respondents in this case) set up under the Foreign Compensation Act.
Microsoft Corp. v. Commission (2007; T-201/04) is a case brought by the European Commission of the European Union (EU) against Microsoft for abuse of its dominant position in the market (according to competition law).
Albemarle Paper Co. v. Moody, 422 US 405 (1975), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that Title VII disparate impact plaintiffs do not need to prove bad faith to be entitled to backpay. It also expanded on the holding from Griggs v. Duke Power that employment tests must be sufficiently job-related.