Ad
related to: lancaster county court docket sheet ca propositions 10 and 13
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
By comparing California over the period 1970 to 2000 with other states, (using data from the US Census Bureau, not state or county-level property records) [6]: 9 Wasi and White (2005) estimated that Proposition 13 caused homeowners to increase the duration of time spent in a given home by 9% (1.04 years), and renters to increase their tenure by ...
Constitutional follow-up to Proposition 13 (1978). Proposition 22 (2000) Passed, then declared unconstitutional: A statute banning same-sex marriage. Proposition 52 (2002) Defeated: Allowing voting registration on Election Day. Proposition 71 (2004) Passed: On the use of stem cells in scientific research. Proposition 73 (2005) Defeated
10 – Passed – Right To Vote. 11 – Passed – Miscellaneous Language Changes Regarding Gender. 12 – Passed – Public Utilities. 13 – Passed – San Diego County Judicial Districts. 14 – Failed – State College System. 15 – Failed – Low Rent Housing. 16 – Failed – Student Tuition, University Of California.
California Proposition 13 may refer to: 1978 California Proposition 13, People's Initiative to Limit Property Taxation; 2010 California Proposition 13, Seismic Retrofitting; 2020 California Proposition 13, Public Preschool, K-12, and College Health and Safety Bond Act
Read The Sacramento Bee Editorial Board endorsements for all 10 statewide propositions before casting your ballot.
Originally, ballot propositions were given a number starting at one each election. This tended to be confusing as often famous initiatives such as Proposition 13 in 1978 might be confused with another initiative in a later year if there were more than twelve proposals on the ballot in any given year. Starting with the November 1982 ballot, the ...
For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us
The filing fee for submitting a proposition to the ballot has been raised by a factor of 10, from $200 to $2,000, following the signing of a law in September 2015. Originally lawmakers wanted to raise the fee to $8,000 but compromised on $2,000. The fee is refunded if the proposition makes it to the ballot.