When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Warren v. District of Columbia - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_v._District_of_Columbia

    Warren, Taliaferro, and Douglas brought the following claims of negligence against the District of Columbia and the Metropolitan Police Department: (1) the dispatcher's failure to forward the 6:23 am call with the proper degree of urgency; (2) the responding officers' failure to follow standard police investigative procedures, specifically ...

  3. Anders v. California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anders_v._California

    Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), was a United States Supreme Court case in which a court-appointed attorney filed a motion to withdraw from the appeal of a criminal case because of his belief that any grounds for appeal were frivolous.

  4. Withdrawal from representation - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Withdrawal_from_representation

    Withdrawal from representation, in United States law, occurs where an attorney terminates a relationship of representing a client. There are two types of withdrawal: mandatory and voluntary. There are two types of withdrawal: mandatory and voluntary.

  5. Police officers to withdraw goodwill in dispute over pay and ...

    www.aol.com/police-officers-withdraw-goodwill...

    The Scottish Police Federation represents 16,500 rank-and-file police officers in Scotland. Police officers to withdraw goodwill in dispute over pay and conditions Skip to main content

  6. Nolle prosequi - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nolle_prosequi

    Nolle prosequi, [a] abbreviated nol or nolle pros, is legal Latin meaning "to be unwilling to pursue". [3] [4] It is a type of prosecutorial discretion in common law, used for prosecutors' declarations that they are voluntarily ending a criminal case before trial or before a verdict is rendered; [5] it is a kind of motion to dismiss and contrasts with an involuntary dismissal.

  7. Consent search - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consent_search

    Police are not required to conduct a search in a way that gives the individual an opportunity to revoke consent, as determined in United States v. Rich , where the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit rejected the argument that "officials must conduct all searches in plain view of the suspect, and in a manner slowly enough that he may ...

  8. AOL

    search.aol.com

    The search engine that helps you find exactly what you're looking for. Find the most relevant information, video, images, and answers from all across the Web.

  9. Thurman v. City of Torrington - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thurman_v._City_of_Torrington

    The police gave Tracey various excuses for their inaction including "the officer who has your case is on vacation." [2] On May 6, 1983, Tracey filed for and was granted a restraining order against Buck. [4] On June 10, 1983, Buck arrived at the house Tracey was staying at and demanded to see her. Tracey remained inside and contacted the police.