Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Comcast Corp. v. FCC, 600 F.3d 642 (D.C. Cir., 2010), is a case at the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia holding that the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) does not have ancillary jurisdiction over the content delivery choices of Internet service providers, under the language of the Communications Act of 1934. [1]
Comcast's trial about the NFL Network's program access complaint with the FCC began on April 14, 2009. At issue was whether Comcast's placement of the NFL Network on a digital sports tier ("Sports Entertainment Package") represented discrimination prevented by the 1992 Cable Act. [78]
On August 1, 2008, the FCC formally voted 3-to-2 to uphold a complaint against Comcast, the largest cable company in the US, ruling that it had illegally inhibited users of its high-speed Internet service from using file-sharing software. The FCC imposed no fine, but required Comcast to end such blocking in 2008.
Comcast claimed that the lawsuit was "an ordinary business grievance masquerading as a racial discrimination claim". [4] Around the time of this filing, Comcast was in the midst of trying to acquire Time Warner, and Time Warner had been named in Allen's suit, [3] but by April 2015, Comcast called
Best practices • Don't enable the "use less secure apps" feature. • Don't reply to any SMS request asking for a verification code. • Don't respond to unsolicited emails or requests to send money.
[1] [2] The PSBCA is within the USPS Judicial Officer Department, with the Judicial Officer also serving as the PSBCA Chairman. [3] The PSBCA’s jurisdiction over contract disputes parallels that of the United States Court of Federal Claims [4] with the contractor generally having the option of filing an appeal with either the PSBCA or the ...
On October 15, 2002, Dolan filed a complaint against the United States and the USPS in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. [1] As "an independent establishment of the executive branch of the Government of the United States," [2] the United States Postal Service enjoys federal sovereign immunity absent
USPS notifies requester and includes copy of complaint; Hearing possible Sender may elect hearing, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. § 3008(d) [5] If elected, a hearing is conducted in accord with 39 C.F.R. § 963 [6] Enforcement USPS asks attorney general to ask a federal district court to enforce the order, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. § 3008(d)