Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The second-largest city in Michigan, Grand Rapids recorded a murder rate of 13.8 per 100,000 in 2020, more than double of the United States rate of 7.8 per 100,000. [12] [13] The overall crime rate declined by one-third between 2003 and 2011, [14] but Grand Rapids set a record with 38 homicides in 2020. [15]
The following table of United States cities by crime rate is based on Federal Bureau of Investigation Uniform Crime Reports (UCR) statistics from 2019 for the 100 most populous cities in America that have reported data to the FBI UCR system. [1] The population numbers are based on U.S. Census estimates for the year end.
Violent crime rate per 100k population by state (2023) [1] This is a list of U.S. states and territories by violent crime rate. It is typically expressed in units of incidents per 100,000 individuals per year; thus, a violent crime rate of 300 (per 100,000 inhabitants) in a population of 100,000 would mean 300 incidents of violent crime per year in that entire population, or 0.3% out of the total.
Detroit is on pace to record its lowest number of homicides in 57 years, according to city and county officials. Detroit on pace for lowest number of homicides in nearly 60 years, Michigan ...
By Amelia Acosta and Anmargaret Warner Violent crime rose in the U.S. last year for the first time since 2006, according to FBI statistics. However, the recent 1.2 percent increase belies a long ...
Crime in the United States. List of U.S. states and territories by violent crime rate; List of United States cities by crime rate; United States cities by crime rate (100,000–250,000) United States cities by crime rate (60,000-100,000) Firearm death rates in the United States by state; Gun violence in the United States by state
Got a monthly budget of $2,600? Good news: Michigan is home to 10 cities where the cost of living expenses can comfortably fit into that budget. Learn More: 7 Ways People Destroy the Value of Their...
Crime rates per capita might also be biased by population size depending on the crime type. [6] This misrepresentation occurs because rates per capita assume that crime increases at the same pace as the number of people in an area. [7] When this linear assumption does not hold, rates per capita still have population effects.