When.com Web Search

  1. Ads

    related to: wallace et calculator 1 8 1 2 adapter air hose

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Hose coupling - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hose_coupling

    Side view of a 1.5 to 2.5 inches (38 to 64 mm) adapter. National Hose thread (NH), also known as National Standard Thread (NST). It is the most common type of fire hose coupling used in the United States. The male and female straight (non-tapered) threads screw together and the connection is sealed with a gasket.

  3. Air-line fitting - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air-line_fitting

    US Industrial 3/8" 8.2/8.5 A-A-59439, ISO 6150B 030 430 30 20/30 H US Industrial 3/8" HP 8 ISO 6150C 170.08 381 84 ARO 310 9 014.09 40 AA Scandinavian 9.5/10 9.5/10 032.10 408 32/1800 Eurostandard 10 10 027 410 27 Schrader 1/2" 017.10 TL US Industrial 1/2" 11 A-A-59439, ISO 6150B 037 550 37 20/30 G US Industrial 1/2" HP 11 ISO 6150C 170.11 471

  4. Piping and plumbing fitting - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piping_and_plumbing_fitting

    This fitting (also known as a "bungalow fitting" or a "cottage fitting") is a sanitary tee that allows two trap arms to be connected at the same level. A toilet is the main connection, with the option of a right or left-hand outlet to the 3" inlet with a choice of 1-1/2" or 2" in size.

  5. Storz - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Storz

    Storz is a type of hose coupling invented by Carl August Guido Storz in 1882 and patented in Switzerland in 1890, and patented in the U.S. in 1893 [1] that connects using interlocking hooks and flanges. It was first specified in standard FEN 301-316, and has been used by German fire brigades since 1933. (See German delivery hose article.)

  6. AOL Mail

    mail.aol.com

    Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!

  7. Wallace tree - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wallace_tree

    Wallace multipliers reduce as much as possible on each layer, whereas Dadda multipliers try to minimize the required number of gates by postponing the reduction to the upper layers. [1] Wallace multipliers were devised by the Australian computer scientist Chris Wallace in 1964. [2] The Wallace tree has three steps: