Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Kennedy v. Mendoza-Martinez, 372 U.S. 144 (1963) – the Court struck down a law revoking citizenship for remaining outside the United States in order to avoid conscription into the armed forces; Rosenberg v. Fleuti, 374 U.S. 449 (1963) Foti v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 375 U.S. 217 (1963) Thompson v. INS, 375 U.S. 384 (1964 ...
(1) Whether the state plaintiffs have Article III standing to challenge the Department of Homeland Security's Guidelines for the Enforcement of Civil Immigration Law; and (2) Whether the Guidelines are contrary to 8 U.S.C. § 1226(c) or 8 U.S.C. § 1231(a) , or otherwise violate the Administrative Procedure Act ; and
The Immigration Reform and Control Act (IRCA or the Simpson–Mazzoli Act) was passed by the 99th United States Congress and signed into law by U.S. President Ronald Reagan on November 6, 1986. The Immigration Reform and Control Act legalized most undocumented immigrants who had arrived in the country prior to January 1, 1984.
Steglich, who specializes in immigration and citizenship law, told the American-Statesman that the policy imposed significant emotional and financial burdens on families that were long-term residents.
A decade ago, the New York politician's stance on the issue sounded more akin to President Donald Trump than the modern Democratic party.
He previously worked on the presidential campaigns of Mitt Romney in 2008 and 2012, being described as a "general policy impresario of the emerging conservative consensus on fighting poverty". [2] Between 2015 and 2019, Cass was a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute for Policy Research , and he was the author of The Once and Future Worker ...
At a time of extraordinary political division and an increase in racist vitriol, the law is designed to further inflame tension and distrust. The heartbreaking personal toll of this Florida law ...
Arizona v. United States, 567 U.S. 387 (2012), was a United States Supreme Court case involving Arizona's SB 1070, a state law intended to increase the powers of local law enforcement that wished to enforce federal immigration laws. The issue is whether the law usurps the federal government's authority to regulate immigration laws and enforcement.