When.com Web Search

  1. Ads

    related to: indirect evidence of retaliation policy document form free

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Retaliatory arrest and prosecution - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Retaliatory_arrest_and...

    He alleged the arrest was in retaliation for his outspoken criticism of city officials. The city argued that the logic of Hartman extended to retaliatory arrest. The Supreme Court, however, allowed his claim to proceed, emphasizing that retaliatory intent could be inferred if the arrest was part of an official policy of retaliation. [2] [3] [4 ...

  3. Documents reveal claims of blackmail and retaliation at top ...

    www.aol.com/documents-reveal-claims-blackmail...

    That same day, the Board of Supervisors unanimously rejected a request from Dictos to authorize a new $2 fee on recorded documents to cover the costs of finding and redacting illegal unenforceable ...

  4. Talbot Resolves - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talbot_Resolves

    The Talbot Resolves was a proclamation made by Talbot County citizens of the British Province of Maryland, on May 24, 1774.The British Parliament had decided to blockade Boston Harbor as punishment for a protest against taxes on tea.

  5. McDonnell Douglas burden-shifting - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McDonnell_Douglas_burden...

    In United States employment discrimination law, McDonnell Douglas burden-shifting or the McDonnell-Douglas burden-shifting framework refers to the procedure for adjudicating a motion for summary judgement under a Title VII disparate treatment claim, in particular a "private, non-class action challenging employment discrimination", [1] that lacks direct evidence of discrimination.

  6. Muldrow v. City of St. Louis - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muldrow_v._City_of_St._Louis

    In employment discrimination cases where the only evidence of discrimination is indirect, courts evaluate the claim under the McDonnell Douglas burden-shifting framework. To have an actionable claim under Title VII, and other employment discrimination statutes, the plaintiff must make out a prima facie (on its face) case of discrimination. This ...

  7. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McDonnell_Douglas_Corp._v...

    McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792 (1973), is a US employment law case by the United States Supreme Court regarding the burdens and nature of proof in proving a Title VII case and the order in which plaintiffs and defendants present proof.