Ads
related to: nas performance comparison
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Comparison [ edit ] Some researchers have made a functional and experimental analysis of several distributed file systems including HDFS, Ceph, Gluster, Lustre and old (1.6.x) version of MooseFS, although this document is from 2013 and a lot of information are outdated (e.g. MooseFS had no HA for Metadata Server at that time).
Both NAS and DAS can have various amount of cache memory, which greatly affects performance. When comparing use of NAS with use of local (non-networked) DAS, the performance of NAS depends mainly on the speed of and congestion on the network.
File system Creator Year of introduction Original operating system; DECtape: DEC: 1964 PDP-6 Monitor OS/3x0 FS: IBM: 1964 OS/360: Level-D DEC: 1968 TOPS-10: George 3 ICT (later ICL) : 1968
German version only. Flash memory shared between OS, NAS and answering machine. Has both a physical TAE and RJ11 FXS port, but both cannot be used simultaneously. Available only in Germany as an OEM model. FRITZ!Box 7369 VDSL2 — 4 Gigabit b/g/n 2.4 300 2 USB 2.0 a/b 1 0 22 512 6.34 English version only. Includes a second VDSL2 port for ADSL ...
The article "Usage share of operating systems" provides a broader, and more general, comparison of operating systems that includes servers, mainframes and supercomputers. Because of the large number and variety of available Linux distributions , they are all grouped under a single entry; see comparison of Linux distributions for a detailed ...
This page was last edited on 28 January 2025, at 07:52 (UTC).; Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License; additional terms may apply.