When.com Web Search

  1. Ads

    related to: railcard two together discount code 10% any order

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Two Together Railcard - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two_Together_Railcard

    The Railcard was launched nationally on 3 March 2014 [5] at a cost of £30.00, although for the first six months a 10% discount was given if it was bought online and a promotional code was quoted. [1] The Two Together Railcard was the first new Railcard scheme to be launched for more than 30 years. [6]

  3. Concessionary fares on the British railway network - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concessionary_fares_on_the...

    The Two Together Railcard offers a discount of one-third on most off-peak tickets nationwide, for two named individuals travelling together. [18] During its trial period, which lasted from 5 September 2011 until 19 May 2012, the main applicant for a Two Together Railcard must live within the West Midlands area (postcodes beginning B, CV, DY, WS ...

  4. Oyster card - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oyster_card

    There is no discount for Pay-as-you-go, although many students hold the National Rail 16–25 Railcard, which can be added to an Oyster card at an Underground station ticket office to obtain a 1/3 reduction on off-peak caps and a 1/3 discount on off-peak Oyster single fares on all rail services. (NB peak National Rail fares may be cheaper with ...

  5. Discounts and allowances - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discounts_and_allowances

    2/10 net 30 - this means the buyer must pay within 30 days of the invoice date, but will receive a 2% discount if they pay within 10 days of the invoice date. 3/7 EOM - this means the buyer will receive a cash discount of 3% if the bill is paid within 7 days after the end of the month indicated on the invoice date.

  6. Timeline of disability rights in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_disability...

    Pike. [10] It was adopted by only two states, for a short time, but has and continues to be influential on debate over legal insanity. [10] The decision was criticized for leaving a jury with no standard to judge impairment of reason or control, did not define mental disease, and left the jury dependent on expert testimony. [43]