Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Correspondence theory is a traditional model which goes back at least to some of the ancient Greek philosophers such as Plato and Aristotle. [2] [3] This class of theories holds that the truth or the falsity of a representation is determined solely by how it relates to a reality; that is, by whether it accurately describes that reality.
Correspondence is quite simply when a claim corresponds with its object. For example, the claim that the White House is in Washington, D.C. is true, if the White House is actually located in Washington. Correspondence is held by many philosophers to be the most valid of the criteria of truth.
Chapters 5 and 6 study the correspondence theory, where a statement is true when it corresponds to a fact. Chapters 6 and 10 concern the doctrine of speech acts. Chapters 8, 9, and 12 reflect on the problems that language encounters in discussing actions and considering the cases of excuses, accusations, and freedom.
First, those that exist in nature, seen and unseen, e.g. between the seven metals and the seven planets, between the planets and parts of the human body or character (or of society). This is the basis of astrology - correspondence between the natural world and the invisible departments of the celestial and supercelestial world, etc.
Correspondence theory centres around the assumption that truth is a matter of accurately copying what is known as "objective reality" and then representing it in thoughts, words, and other symbols. [19] Many modern theorists have stated that this ideal cannot be achieved without analysing additional factors.
The correspondence theory of truth states that truth consists in correspondence with reality. [7] Or in the words of Thomas Aquinas: "A judgment is said to be true when it conforms to the external reality". [14] Truthmaker theory is closely related to correspondence theory; some authors see it as a modern version of correspondence theory. [15]
Perhaps explain the Theory by describing one it therefore is NOT. As described, I struggle to understand how the Correspondence Theory is not possible. Also, explanations of alternatives to the Correspondence Theory would be helpful - as is done in the Stanford Encyclopedia entry. IntangibleTruth 06:27, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
This "modification" of the consensus view is an appeal to the correspondence theory of truth, which is opposed to the consensus theory of truth. Long-run scientific pragmatism was defended by Charles Sanders Peirce. A variant of this viewpoint is associated with Jürgen Habermas, though he later abandoned it.