Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
1986 protest against Proposition 65 California Proposition 65 warning before August 31, 2018 [2]. In 1986, political strategists including Tom Hayden and his wife, environmental activist Jane Fonda, thought that an initiative addressing toxic pollutants would bring more left leaning voters to the polls to help Democrat Tom Bradley in his gubernatorial race against incumbent Republican George ...
The following is a list of chemicals published as a requirement of Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986, commonly known as California Proposition 65, that are "known to the state to cause cancer or reproductive toxicity" as of January 3, 2020. [1]
California Proposition 65 may refer to: California Proposition 65 (1986) (passed) The Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986. Requires public notice of products containing dangerous or carcinogenic chemicals. California Proposition 65 (2004) (failed) would have protected local jurisdiction revenues from state government encroachment.
The suit alleged that SoCalGas had violated California's Proposition 65, which requires businesses to provide warnings about possible exposures to toxic chemicals.
In the video, Alisha highlights several items, including a $10 ONEDESIGN Home product and a $16.99 item from Marshalls, both featuring California Proposition 65 warnings.
The group brings litigation under a California law, the Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986, which was enacted as a citizens' ballot proposition and is often referred to as the state's "Prop 65" law. Prop 65 requires companies to provide warnings when their products expose Californians to a chemical or chemicals that are known ...
A new California law aims to clarify the labels on packaged foods, such as 'sell by,' 'best if used by' and 'use by.' ... Read more:Controversial Prop. 65 warning labels about toxic chemicals are ...
Elimination of OEHHA will have a very minor impact on the budget problems because of several reasons: (1) OEHHA's budget is very small (1/500th of 1% of the General Fund, or 1/50,000th) compared to the state deficit; $8.3 million of OEHHA's budget is general fund (2) about half of OEHHA's budget is funded by special funds (e.g. Proposition 65 ...