Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA), Pub. L. 106–274 (text), codified as 42 U.S.C. § 2000cc et seq., is a United States federal law that protects individuals, houses of worship, and other religious institutions from discrimination in zoning and landmarking laws. [1]
President Bill Clinton signed the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000 into law on September 22 of 2000. [1] This piece of legislation was intended to protect the free exercise of religion as it relates to institutionalized persons and land use. [1] One provision of RLUIPA pertaining to land use is the Equal Terms ...
As prescribed by House Rules, the committee's jurisdiction is on land use issues which includes the following: [1] Enhancement of resource use and management of indigenous cultural communities; Land valuation regulation; Preservation of historical and cultural heritage sites
This work is in the public domain in the Philippines and possibly other jurisdictions because it is a work created by an officer or employee of the Government of the Philippines or any of its subdivisions and instrumentalities, including government-owned and/or controlled corporations, as part of their regularly prescribed official duties ...
English: Republic Act No. 11201 (Department of Human Settlements and Urban Development Act) PDF file on the Official Gazette of the Republic of the Philippines website, signed by President Rodrigo Duterte on February 14, 2019
The act defines "cultural property" as "all products of human creativity by which a people and a nation reveal their identity, including churches, mosques and other places of religious worship, schools and natural history specimens and sites, whether public or privately-owned, movable or immovable, and tangible or intangible."
This work is in the public domain in the Philippines and possibly other jurisdictions because it is a work created by an officer or employee of the Government of the Philippines or any of its subdivisions and instrumentalities, including government-owned and/or controlled corporations, as part of their regularly prescribed official duties ...
The archbishop brought suit, challenging the ruling under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) of 1993. Flores argued that the Boerne, Texas, congregation had outgrown the existing structure, rendering the ruling a substantial burden on the free exercise of religion without a compelling state interest. [3]