Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Servs., Inc., 504 U.S. 451 (1992), is a 1992 Supreme Court decision in which the Court held that even though an equipment manufacturer lacked significant market power in the primary market for its equipment—copier-duplicators and other imaging equipment—nonetheless, it could have sufficient market power in the secondary aftermarket for repair parts to ...
Kodak continues to produce specialty films and film for newer and more popular consumer formats, but it has discontinued the manufacture of film in most older formats. Among its most famous discontinued film brands was Kodachrome. [125] [126] Kodak was a leading producer of silver halide paper used for printing from film and digital images.
This week I want to highlight of Eastman Kodak's (OTCBB: EKDKQ.PK) Antonio Perez, a CEO that I could actually make a very good case for being the Gaffe of the Past Decade. ... Fail! Fail, fail ...
Kodak ultimately lost the suit, which lasted over a decade and cost the company $5 Million. [20] [21] Eastman paid close attention to Kodak's advertisements. He coined the slogan, “You press the button, we do the rest”, which became ubiquitous in the general public. [22] The Kodak factory and main office in Rochester, c. 1900-1910
Eastman Kodak (NYS: EK) has been reporting losses since 2007 and is scrambling to return to profitability. Drawing down $160 million from its $400 million revolving-credit line recently stoked ...
The announcement of Eastman Kodak's (OTC: EKDKQ) bankruptcy filing yesterday marked what many saw as an inevitable step for the once-iconic photography giant. But if you looked up a stock quote ...
Changing Focus: Kodak and the Battle to Save a Great American Company is a book about the corporate history and future of the Kodak corporation. In particular, it discusses Kodak's efforts to maintain and diversity its photography businesses in the face of challenges from digital photography, and the mixed results of these efforts.
When Kodak announced instant film cameras in 1976, Polaroid announced they were suing them, accusing Kodak of having stolen its patented instant photography process. [1] In the two years that followed the lawsuit, total sales of instant cameras climbed from 7.4 million cameras in 1976 to 10.3 million in 1977 and 14.3 million in 1978.