Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The Extensible Configuration Checklist Description Format (XCCDF) is an XML format specifying security checklists, benchmarks and configuration documentation. XCCDF development is being pursued by NIST , the NSA , The MITRE Corporation , and the US Department of Homeland Security .
Download as PDF; Printable version; In other projects ... or STIG is a configuration standard consisting of cybersecurity requirements for a specific product. The use ...
A cyber PHA or cyber HAZOP is a safety-oriented methodology to conduct a cybersecurity risk assessment for an industrial control system (ICS) or safety instrumented system (SIS). It is a systematic, consequence-driven approach that is based upon industry standards such as ISA 62443-3-2 , ISA TR84.00.09, ISO/IEC 27005 :2018, ISO 31000 :2009 and ...
The security controls give no-nonsense, actionable recommendations for cyber security, written in language that’s easily understood by IT personnel. [4] Goals of the Consensus Audit Guidelines include Leveraging cyber offense to inform cyber defense, focusing on high payoff areas
The 2011 Standard of Good Practice. The Standard of Good Practice for Information Security (SOGP), published by the Information Security Forum (ISF), is a business-focused, practical and comprehensive guide to identifying and managing information security risks in organizations and their supply chains.
The NIST Cybersecurity Framework is meant to be a living document, meaning it will be updated and improved over time to keep up with changes in technology and cybersecurity threats, as well as to integrate best-practices and lessons learned. Since releasing version 1.1 in 2018, stakeholders have provided feedback that the CSF needed to be updated.
Checkmarx's research department is known for uncovering technical vulnerabilities in popular technologies, software, applications, and IoT devices. [3]In November 2019, the company's security research team uncovered a number of vulnerabilities affecting Google and Samsung smartphones.
The software vendor is usually not legally liable for the cost if a vulnerability is used in an attack, which creates an incentive to make cheaper but less secure software. [71] Some companies are covered by laws, such as PCI , HIPAA , and Sarbanes-Oxley , that place legal requirements on vulnerability management.