Ads
related to: is chatgpt reliable for research
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
While AI assistants like ChatGPT can provide information to help start the research process, directly using its uncited, unverifiable outputs for Wikipedia articles risks compromising our project's standards of reliability, references, collaborative editing, and ongoing improveability.
Lastly, we need to keep in mind that AI-generated articles (as well as AI capabilities in general) are a moving target, with recent systems getting more reliable at generating Wikipedia-type articles than a simplistic ChatGPT prompt would achieve, see e.g. the previous "Recent research" issue: "Article-writing AI is less 'prone to reasoning ...
ChatGPT is a generative artificial intelligence chatbot [2] [3] developed by OpenAI and launched in 2022. It is currently based on the GPT-4o large language model (LLM). ChatGPT can generate human-like conversational responses and enables users to refine and steer a conversation towards a desired length, format, style, level of detail, and language. [4]
The results might come as an unpleasant surprise to Wikipedians and the Wikimedia Foundation, which has consistently sought to present Wikipedia as a more reliable option over LLM-based tools like ChatGPT (see e.g. "In the media" in this Signpost issue:
OpenAI said the agencies can deploy ChatGPT Gov in their own Microsoft Azure commercial cloud, and will have access to many of the features and capabilities of ChatGPT Enterprise, including custom ...
The authors stop short of attempting to use this difference (between generally larger pageview increases in ChatGPT-less languages and generally smaller increases for those where ChatGPT was available) to quantify the overall effect of ChatGPT directly, perhaps because such an estimation would become rather statistically involved and require ...