When.com Web Search

  1. Ad

    related to: isaiah 53 vicarious suffering definition biblical theology

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Isaiah 53 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isaiah_53

    Sifre Deuteronomy 355 interprets Isaiah 53:12 as an end-times description of Moses' honor at the head of Israel's scholars. [70] Numbers Rabbah, quoting Isaiah 53:12, interprets the verse in terms of Israel's final redemption: "Because Israel exposed their souls to death in exile-as you read, Because he bared his soul unto death (Isa. LIII, 12 ...

  3. Substitutionary atonement - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Substitutionary_atonement

    According to Pate, the Jewish scriptures describe three types of vicarious atonement: the Paschal Lamb although the Paschal Lamb was not a sin offering; "the sacrificial system as a whole", although these were for "mistakes", not intentional sins and with the Day of Atonement as the most essential element; and the idea of the suffering servant (Isaiah 42:1-9, 49:1-6, 50:4-11, 52:13-53:12).

  4. Penal substitution - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Penal_substitution

    Penal substitution, also called penal substitutionary atonement and especially in older writings forensic theory, [1] [2] is a theory of the atonement within Protestant Christian theology, which declares that Christ, voluntarily submitting to God the Father's plan, was punished (penalized) in the place of (substitution) sinners, thus satisfying the demands of justice and propitiation, so God ...

  5. Man of Sorrows - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Man_of_Sorrows

    The phrase translated into English as "Man of Sorrows" ("אִישׁ מַכְאֹבוֹת ‎", ’îš maḵ’ōḇōṯ in the Hebrew Bible, vir dolōrum in the Vulgate) occurs at verse 3 (in Isaiah 53): 3) He is despised and rejected of men, a Man of sorrows, and acquainted with grief.

  6. Satisfaction theory of atonement - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satisfaction_theory_of...

    Both affirm the substitutionary and vicarious nature of the atonement, but penal substitution offers a specific explanation as to what the suffering is for: punishment. [citation needed] Augustine teaches substitutionary atonement. However, the specific interpretation differed as to what this suffering for sinners meant.

  7. Darrell L. Bock - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darrell_L._Bock

    The Gospel According to Isaiah 53: Encountering the Suffering Servant in Jewish and Christian Theology. Grand Rapids, MI: Kregel Academic. ISBN 978-0-8254-2593-6. ——— (2012). A Theology of Luke and Acts: God's Promised Program, Realized for All Nations. Biblical Theology of the New Testament. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan. ISBN 978-0-3102 ...

  8. Moral influence theory of atonement - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moral_influence_theory_of...

    He rejected the idea of "vicarious satisfaction". [note 2] According to Socinus, Jesus' death offers mankind "a perfect example of self-sacrificial dedication to God". [3] A number of theologians see "example" (or "exemplar") theories of the atonement as variations of the moral influence theory. [8]

  9. Governmental theory of atonement - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Governmental_theory_of...

    Governmental theory holds that Christ's suffering was a real and meaningful substitute for the punishment humans deserve, but it did not consist of Christ's receiving the exact punishment due to sinful people. [1] [2] Instead, God publicly demonstrated his displeasure with sin through the suffering of his own sinless and obedient Son as a ...