When.com Web Search

Search results

1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network

2. Armendariz v. Foundation Health Psychcare Services, Inc.

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Armendariz_v._Foundation...

   Full case name: Marybeth Armendariz et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. Foundation Health Psychcare Services, Inc., Defendant and Appellant. Citation(s) 24 Cal. 4th 83, 6 P.3d 669; 99 Cal. Rptr. 2d. 745: Holding; A contract must contain both a prodecural and substantiative element of unconscionability in order to be void.

3. Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. Superior Court - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynamex_Operations_West...

   Dynamex Operations W. v. Superior Court and Charles Lee, Real Party in Interest, 4 Cal.5th 903 (Cal. 2018) was a landmark case handed down by the California Supreme Court on April 30, 2018. A class of drivers for a same-day delivery company, Dynamex, claimed that they were misclassified as independent contractors and thus unlawfully deprived of ...

4. Tunkl v. Regents of the University of California - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tunkl_v._Regents_of_the...

   This case history arose in relation to Cal. Civ. Code §1668, a statute that states "All contracts which have for their object, directly or indirectly, to exempt anyone from responsibility for his own fraud, or willful injury to the person or property of another, or violation of law, whether willful or negligent, are against the policy of the ...

5. Drennan v. Star Paving Co. - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drennan_v._Star_Paving_Co.

   Drennan v. Star Paving Company, 51 Cal. 2d 409 (1958), was a California Supreme Court case in which the court held that a party who has detrimentally relied on an offer that is revoked prior to acceptance may assert promissory estoppel to recover damages. [1]

6. Li v. Yellow Cab Co. - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Li_v._Yellow_Cab_Co.

   Li v. Yellow Cab Co., 13 Cal.3d 804, 532 P.2d 1226 (1975), commonly referred to simply as Li, is a California Supreme Court case that judicially embraced comparative negligence in California tort law and rejected strict contributory negligence.

7. Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc. - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greenman_v._Yuba_Power...

   Yuba Power Products, Inc, was a California torts case in which the Supreme Court of California dealt with the torts regarding product liability and warranty breaches. The primary legal issue of the case was to determine whether a manufacturer is strictly liable in tort when an article he places on the market proves to have a defect that causes ...