Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
In a topological abelian group, convergence of a series is defined as convergence of the sequence of partial sums. An important concept when considering series is unconditional convergence, which guarantees that the limit of the series is invariant under permutations of the summands.
The purpose of this article is to serve as an annotated index of various modes of convergence and their logical relationships. For an expository article, see Modes of convergence. Simple logical relationships between different modes of convergence are indicated (e.g., if one implies another), formulaically rather than in prose for quick ...
The different notions of convergence capture different properties about the sequence, with some notions of convergence being stronger than others. For example, convergence in distribution tells us about the limit distribution of a sequence of random variables.
Convergence proof techniques are canonical patterns of mathematical proofs that sequences or functions converge to a finite limit when the argument tends to infinity.. There are many types of sequences and modes of convergence, and different proof techniques may be more appropriate than others for proving each type of convergence of each type of sequence.
Unconditional convergence is often defined in an equivalent way: A series is unconditionally convergent if for every sequence () =, with {, +}, the series = converges. If X {\displaystyle X} is a Banach space , every absolutely convergent series is unconditionally convergent, but the converse implication does not hold in general.
[1] [7]: 620 A sequence () that converges to is said to converge at least R-linearly if there exists an error-bounding sequence () such that | | and () converges Q-linearly to zero; analogous definitions hold for R-superlinear convergence, R-sublinear convergence, R-quadratic convergence, and so on.
If r < 1, then the series converges absolutely. If r > 1, then the series diverges. If r = 1, the root test is inconclusive, and the series may converge or diverge. The root test is stronger than the ratio test: whenever the ratio test determines the convergence or divergence of an infinite series, the root test does too, but not conversely. [1]
A series can be uniformly convergent and absolutely convergent without being uniformly absolutely-convergent. For example, if ƒ n (x) = x n /n on the open interval (−1,0), then the series Σf n (x) converges uniformly by comparison of the partial sums to those of Σ(−1) n /n, and the series Σ|f n (x)| converges absolutely at each point by the geometric series test, but Σ|f n (x)| does ...