Ad
related to: user error examples in research paper
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The URM Model [14] characterizes use errors in terms of the user's failure to manage a system deficiency. Six categories of use errors are described in a URM document: Expected faults with risky results; Expected faults with unexpected results; Expected user errors in identifying risky situations (this study); User Errors in handling expected ...
These phrases are used as a humorous [7] way to describe user errors. A highly popularized example of this is a user mistaking their CD-ROM tray for a cup holder, or a user looking for the "any key". However, any variety of stupidity or ignorance-induced problems can be described as user errors.
Transcription and transposition errors are found everywhere, even in professional articles in newspapers or books. They can be missed by editors quite easily, just as they can be created quite easily. The most obvious cure for the errors is for the user to watch the screen when they type, and to proofread.
These phrases are used as a humorous [7] way to describe user errors. A highly popularized example of this is a user mistaking their CD-ROM tray for a cup holder, or a user looking for the "any key". However, any variety of stupidity or ignorance-induced problems can be described as user errors. PEBKAC/PEBCAK/PICNIC
Examples of this include the failure to account for measurement error, or the failure to adequately control experiments for any parameters being measured. Fabrication can also occur in the context of undergraduate or graduate studies wherein a student fabricates a laboratory or homework assignment.
In statistical hypothesis testing, there are various notions of so-called type III errors (or errors of the third kind), and sometimes type IV errors or higher, by analogy with the type I and type II errors of Jerzy Neyman and Egon Pearson. Fundamentally, type III errors occur when researchers provide the right answer to the wrong question, i.e ...
In November 2015, the Office of Research Integrity (ORI) found that Potti had engaged in research misconduct. [32] 2010 A 1998 paper by Andrew Wakefield proposing that the MMR vaccine might cause autism, which was responsible for the MMR vaccine controversy, was retracted because "the claims in the original paper that children were ...
A recent example of this is work on scientific fraud that looks at image duplication, but then moves to the paper or journal level to make their claim. For instance, if a team finds that .1% of images are duplicated (1 of 1000), they can report this, which is not that exciting.