Ads
related to: a levels needed for archaeology
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
This is a list of Advanced Level (usually referred to as A-Level) subjects ... Archaeology [7] [9] Citizenship Studies [7] [9] Classics [9] Communication and Culture ...
[citation needed] There is also a flourishing industry selling places on commercial training excavations and archaeological holiday tours. [citation needed] Archaeologists prize local knowledge and often liaise with local historical and archaeological societies, which is one reason why Community archaeology projects are starting to become more ...
The main type at this level is the Conurbation or metropolis – a consolidating regional urban area or catchment area, the metropolitan area, consisting of possibly a central city, suburbs and satellite towns or cities, with a population usually reaching one million or more people. Larger types at this level would be:
The A-level (Advanced Level) is a subject-based qualification conferred as part of the General Certificate of Education, as well as a school leaving qualification offered by the educational bodies in the United Kingdom and the educational authorities of British Crown dependencies to students completing secondary or pre-university education. [1]
The history of archaeology in the US is rooted in the part-time enthusiasm of, usually wealthy, Antiquarians who formed the field's initial foundation. By the start of the Great Depression, the field was mostly practiced by a small group of elite academics with varying levels of research standards. [2]
Martinón-Torres and Killick distinguish ‘scientific archaeology’ (as an epistemology) from ‘archaeological science’ (the application of specific techniques to archaeological materials). [1] Martinón-Torres and Killick claim that ‘archaeological science’ has promoted the development of high-level theory in archaeology.
For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us
Second, he highlighted that theory was required to compare two different interpretations of the past and decide which one was the more likely. [9] Third, he asserted that theory was needed for the archaeologist to accept and admit to their own personal biases and agendas in interpreting the material evidence. [10]