Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Pay-per-call advertising is not to be confused with premium-rate telephone numbers. [3] Pay-per-call is the inverse of a premium telephone number, in that the advertiser who receives the call, not the caller, is charged for the service. Since it is cost per lead advertising, the rates are higher than for toll-free telephone number service. In ...
Cost per lead, often abbreviated as CPL, is an online advertising pricing model, where the advertiser pays for an explicit sign-up from a consumer interested in the advertiser's offer. It is also commonly called online lead generation .
Pay-per-Sale Search Engine Marketing is a variant of pay-per-sale, whereby the traffic source is largely search engine traffic, such as that from Google's AdWords "pay-per-click" system. The business model means that merchants no longer bear the cost of " pay-per-click "; instead, the " pay-per-sale " provider takes on the risk of conversion.
In 1972, the oil price per barrel was US$1.50, which later rose to US$2.28 per barrel. War in the middle east and oil embargo by Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries ( OPEC ) had caused the price per barrel to rise until US$12.00, thus giving more incentives for Malaysia to set up her own oil company.
Audit firm Deloitte PLT will pay Malaysia's government $80 million to resolve all claims related to its auditing of accounts of scandal-linked state fund 1MDB and its unit SRC International from ...
Pay-per-click (PPC) has an advantage over cost-per-impression in that it conveys information about how effective the advertising was. Clicks are a way to measure attention and interest. If the main purpose of an ad is to generate a click, or more specifically drive traffic to a destination, then pay-per-click is the preferred metric.
From January 2008 to December 2012, if you bought shares in companies when Donald R. Keough joined the board, and sold them when he left, you would have a 9.0 percent return on your investment, compared to a -2.8 percent return from the S&P 500.
From April 2008 to April 2012, if you bought shares in companies when George L. Mikan III joined the board, and sold them when he left, you would have a -48.3 percent return on your investment, compared to a 0.3 percent return from the S&P 500.