Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., 573 U.S. 682 (2014), is a landmark decision [1] [2] in United States corporate law by the United States Supreme Court allowing privately held for-profit corporations to be exempt from a regulation that its owners religiously object to, if there is a less restrictive means of furthering the law's interest, according to the provisions of the Religious Freedom ...
ADF also litigated a 2014 case challenging the Affordable Care Act, or Obamacare. In Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., the Court ruled that the birth control mandate in employee-funded health plans was unconstitutional, since there existed a less restrictive means of furthering the law’s interest. [5]
The case is a result of prior court actions in Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., [1] in 2014, and Zubik v. Burwell, [2] in 2016, which left the United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to promulgate new regulations on the mandate.
In Bostock v. Clayton County, ... In Burwell v. Hobby Lobby, ... The most recent case, 303 Creative LLC v. Elenis, concerns a Colorado web designer who does not want to design websites for same ...
Duncan argued two cases before the Supreme Court of the United States, and has acted as lead counsel in numerous other cases in that Court, including Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., 134 S.Ct. 2751 (2014), in which he successfully led litigation challenging the Affordable Care Act's contraceptive mandate on behalf of Hobby Lobby stores. [1]
For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us
The United States government stated a similar position in a brief for the case submitted before the U.S. Supreme Court handed down its decision in Burwell v. Hobby Lobby, writing that "Congress could not have anticipated, and did not intend, such a broad and unprecedented expansion of RFRA. ... The test Congress reinstated through RFRA ...
For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us