Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
City of Sherrill v. Oneida Indian Nation of New York, 544 U.S. 197 (2005), was a Supreme Court of the United States case in which the Court held that repurchase of traditional tribal lands 200 years later did not restore tribal sovereignty to that land.
It followed Oneida Indian Nation of New York v. County of Oneida (Oneida I) (1974), holding that there was federal subject-matter jurisdiction, and was followed by City of Sherrill v. Oneida Indian Nation of New York (2005), rejecting the tribe's attempt in a later lawsuit to re-assert tribal sovereignty over parcels of land re-acquired by the ...
Oneida Indian Nation of New York State (Oneida II) (1985), rejecting all of the affirmative defenses raised by the counties in the same action, and City of Sherrill v. Oneida Indian Nation of New York (Sherrill) (2005), rejecting the tribe's attempt in a later lawsuit to reassert tribal sovereignty over parcels of land reacquired by the tribe ...
Brendale v. Confederated Yakima Indian Nation, 492 U.S. 408 (1989) Oklahoma Tax Commission v. Citizen Band, Potawatomi Indian Tribe of Oklahoma, 498 U.S. 505 (1991) South Dakota v. Bourland, 508 U.S. 679 (1993) Idaho v. United States, 533 U.S. 262 (2001) City of Sherrill v. Oneida Indian Nation of New York, 544 U.S. 197 (2005) Plains Commerce ...
The case involved the issue of whether tribal sovereign immunity protected the Oneida Indian Nation against foreclosure by local taxing authorities to enforce due property taxes. After the Supreme Court granted certiorari, the tribe passed a tribal declaration and ordinance waiving its immunity against tax enforcement.
Pages in category "Oneida Indian Nation" The following 5 pages are in this category, out of 5 total. ... City of Sherrill v. Oneida Indian Nation of New York; O.
AOL latest headlines, entertainment, sports, articles for business, health and world news.
[2] [12] In August 2014 Halbritter aided in reclaiming approximately 13,000 acres of historic Oneida land, which was placed into a trust under the responsibility of the Department of the Interior. [2] The 2014 victory for the Oneida Indian Nation was heavily based on the 2005 case, Sherrill v.